Whenever I spend a weekend at a cottage it seems I get to know the other guests indirectly. Sharing space and geography with one another, the people on the dock slowly take form, becoming illuminated by unguarded and accidental moments rather than by the wining parry and thrust of cocktail conversation. Our encounters are plot less and without agenda, immersive, and slowly you just get a “feeling” for one another. It almost exists exterior to time, if that makes any sense, as we share a landscape that might be new to us, but is actually ancient, existing in geological rather than human time. There\u2019s something humbling in that, and also something very honest in getting to know somebody when they\u2019re outside of their lives rather than confined by them.<\/p>\n
<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n Boyhood, Richard Linklater\u2019s most recent film, had this kind of \u201ccottage effect\u201d on me. Shot intermittently over 12 years, it depicts the unhurried, unremarkable metamorphosis of a boy as he ages from 6 to 18. Nothing really happens in the film, at least not as we\u2019ve come to expect from the conventional, action-packed narratives that are part of our typical entertainment diet. Studiously avoiding exaggeration, Linklater employs a quiet, understated realism. Instead of getting to know the people on screen through defining acts of high drama, they\u2019re revealed to us through ordinary, low-key repetitions. We get to know Mason, the boy in the film, before his personality is formed, and this makes for an unusually intimate and sympathetic portrait. We\u2019ve been watching his pain and hope since he was a child, and like a parent, we cannot but help love him for that, even if we might not actually like him all the time.<\/p>\n